Branded residences and homeowners’ associations (‘comunidades de propietarios’): agreement with the hotel operator
An increasing number of purchasers are showing interest in the so-called branded residences, which combine the advantages of acquiring a private home with the sophisticated design, luxury services and professional management provided by a hotel operator. A key aspect of this investment is understanding the relationship between the hotel operator and the homeowners’ association.The Supreme Court reinforces the principle of legitimate expectations
The court argues that, although the CJEU has ruled that the customs authorities of the country of import are not obliged to accept certificates of origin beyond the period of validity provided for in customs regulations, they must accept such certificates if they have previously exercised their powers of control.The EU proposes to redefine labor mobility by reforming the coordination of social security and is committed to quality employment
In the week of Europe Day (9 May), we look at the reform that the European Union institutions are working on about social security coordination rules and their roadmap for quality employment.Roncato: When a coexistence agreement redefines the rules of a trademark conflict
The Spanish Supreme Court has brought to an end the trademark dispute between the two branches of the Italian Roncato family, a leading name in the luggage sector. The companies, Valigeria Roncato and Baulificio Italiano, will continue to use the surname “Roncato” in their respective trademarks, in accordance with the coexistence agreement signed in 1996.Spain: A review of the main tax measures introduced by the royal decree-law in response to the crisis in the Middle East
Following the repeal of the two previous royal decree-laws, the government pushes forward with tax measures aimed at lowering energy costs and other personal income and corporate income tax measures relating, among others, to the use of energy from renewable sources.The CJEU strengthens control over the refusal of national judicial bodies to refer questions for a preliminary ruling
The court states that courts of last instance must give adequate reasons for their decision not to refer a question for a preliminary ruling, even in the absence of an express request from the parties.