##  [Tax Newsletter - September 2018 | Decisions](/pt/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-september-2018-decisions) 

# Tax Newsletter - September 2018 | Decisions





Spain - 10 / 08 / 2018





[TAX NEWSLETTER - SEPTEMBER 2018](http://www.garrigues.com/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-september-2018 "boton-newsletter")

























- <a aria-label="Link" class="fs-5" data-content="Copied link" data-placement="top" data-toggle="popover" data-trigger="focus" data-url="https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-september-2018-decisions" id="get-app-artwork" role="button" tabindex="0"></a>
- [](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-september-2018-decisions)
- [](<https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Tax Newsletter - September 2018 | Decisions&url=https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-september-2018-decisions>)
- [](<https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-september-2018-decisions&t=Tax Newsletter - September 2018 | Decisions>)

 







   Previous    Next  



















Audit procedure

**After maximum period for completion of audit work has run, subsequent referral of the case to public prosecutor’s office does not toll statute of limitations**

*Central Economic-Administrative Tribunal (TEAC). Decision of July 23, 2018*

Following the interpretation determined by the Supreme Court in its judgments of November 3, 2011 and March 15, 2012, TEAC concluded that, after the maximum period for completion of audit work as set out in the repealed Law 1/1998, of February 26, 1998 on taxpayers’ rights and safeguards (i.e. 12 months) has run, the <a>statute of limitations for AEAT's right to make an assessment is not considered to be tolled as a result of the notification of commencement of audit work and, therefore, a subsequent referral of the case to the public prosecutor's office cannot be held to have the effect of tolling the statute of limitations period.</a>

Tax on retail sales of hydrocarbons

**Entities acting as intermediaries between taxable person and end customer are not authorized to apply for a tax refund**

*Central Economic-Administrative Tribunal. Decision of July 23, 2018*

TEAC recalled that, for taxes that are legally required to be charged to other individuals or entities, as in the case of the tax on retail sales of certain hydrocarbons, the individual or entity that has paid the tax is the party entitled to obtain a refund of incorrectly charged taxes if the following requirements are met: (i) the tax must have been charged on an invoice or document serving as an invoice –where the legislation governing the tax so provides-, (ii) the incorrectly charged amount of tax must have been paid over and not refunded by the tax authorities to the person to whom they were charged or to a third party; and (iii) the party with tax obligations that paid the charge must not be entitled to deduct their input tax.

On that basis, TEAC reiterated the interpretation determined in its Decision of February 15, 2017 and concluded that the entities acting as intermediaries between the taxable person for the tax on retail sales of hydrocarbon and the end customer are not entitled to apply for a refund of the tax, because when making the supply they charge the whole of the tax via the price to those acquiring the taxed products. It is therefore the end customers who bear the economic burden of the tax and are entitled to the refund of the tax on retail sales of hydrocarbons.

This same interpretation was determined by the Supreme Court in its judgment dated February 13, 2018.









[Tax](/pt/en_GB/tags/tax)





---

 This publication is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or advice of any other kind. It does not seek to offer a comprehensive summary of the legislation and developments to which it refers nor to cover all published material, but rather to provide an overview of selected topics. It is therefore recommended that the official texts be consulted and specific professional advice be sought. Garrigues does not accept any liability for the use made of this information and assumes no obligation to update it after publication.



---





 

 



 

 

### Contact

 

 ![Eduardo Abad Valdenebro - Garrigues](/sites/default/files/styles/medium/public/team/photo/Eduardo_Abad_Valdenebro_en_20260611.jpg?itok=XJmuqiG8)

[Eduardo Abad](/pt/en_GB/team/eduardo-abad-valdenebro)




![](/themes/custom/garriguestheme/img/iconos/email-contacto.svg)[Contact](<mailto:eduardo.abad@garrigues.com >)

- +34 91 514 52 00
    
    [Madrid](https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/office/madrid)
 










 

[Find more professionals](../team)

 

 



 

### Related services 

 

- [Tax ](/pt/en_GB/services/tax)
 


 

 



 

 

- 
 


 

 



 

## Find a publication

   

   Select service   Administrative and Constitutional Law   Agribusiness and Food   Automotive   Banking and Finance   Corporate and M&amp;A   Criminal Law and Internal Investigations   Data Economy, Privacy and Cybersecurity   Dispute Resolution: Litigation and Arbitration   Energy   EU and Antitrust Law   Family Business   Fashion Law   Financial Regulation   Human Capital Services   Infrastructure   Insurance   Intellectual Property   Labor and Employment   Life Sciences and Healthcare   Media and Entertainment   Planning, Zoning and Environment   Private Equity   Real Estate   Restructuring and Insolvency   Securities Markets   Sports   Startups &amp; Open innovation   Sustainability   Tax   Technology, Communications and Digital   Tourism and Hotels   Transport, Logistics and Shipping    Facet Services detail   Facet Services detail  

 



   Select type of content   Publications   Newsletters   Garrigues collection   Laws: amendments at a glance   News    Facet Publication type detail   Facet Publication type detail  

 



  Min  

 Max  

 







 

## News search engine