##  [Tax Newsletter - December 2018 | Decisions and Rulings](/pt/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-december-2018-decisions-and-rulings) 

# Tax Newsletter - December 2018 | Decisions and Rulings





Spain - 12 / 21 / 2018

















- <a aria-label="Link" class="fs-5" data-content="Copied link" data-placement="top" data-toggle="popover" data-trigger="focus" data-url="https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-december-2018-decisions-and-rulings" id="get-app-artwork" role="button" tabindex="0"></a>
- [](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-december-2018-decisions-and-rulings)
- [](<https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Tax Newsletter - December 2018 | Decisions and Rulings&url=https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-december-2018-decisions-and-rulings>)
- [](<https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-december-2018-decisions-and-rulings&t=Tax Newsletter - December 2018 | Decisions and Rulings>)

 







   Previous    Next  



















Requests for information

**The tax relevance of a request for information must be expressly explained when it does not arise clearly from the procedure**

*Central Economic-Administrative Tribunal. Decision of December 4, 2018*

The information sought in requests for information must have tax relevance. This relevance is linked to the requirement to give reasons. TEAC concluded therefore that where the tax relevance of a request “does not ostensibly appear to be from the procedure”, an express explanation must appear in the request.

In the specific case examined by TEAC, the tax authorities had requested information on “the specific medical service that has been provided to a given client or the identification of the specific persons who provided the identified service”. TEAC concluded that with that brief request for information, the tax relevance “does not ostensibly appear to be from the procedure”, in that the requested data do not show any usefulness or financial content for the tax authorities.

Management procedure

**An audit of reported values may be carried out in a limited review procedure**

*Central Economic-Administrative Tribunal. Decision of December 10, 2018*

TEAC has set as an official interpretation that a limited review is a suitable procedure for carrying out an audit of reported values (both where this is its only purpose, and where the audit of reported values is a step within a broader audit of the taxable event), provided that the responsible authority considers that the procedure could give rise to an additional issue that does not simply involve auditing reported values.

TEAC's conclusion is based on the premise that all the guarantees offered by an audit of reported values, as an independent procedure, are present in a limited review and, in particular, the interested party's right to apply for an expert appraisal made at the taxpayer’s instance.

Review procedure

**The absence of standing to bring challenges for a taxable person in a procedure is remedied if the assessments are notified with information on the routes for challenges**

*Central Economic-Administrative Tribunal. Decision of December 04, 2018*

A partial audit was conducted on a company. The assessments determined in the audit were notified to both the company and its shareholders. In the notification of the assessments to the shareholders it was expressly mentioned that the assessments related to the company but that, since the company had not appeared in the procedure, the assessments had been notified to the shareholders also. The notifications included the relevant “challenge footnote”.

Both company and shareholders all filed economic-administrative claims against the assessments.

In relation to their standing to bring claims:

TEAC did not question the standing to bring challenges of the company, which had not been dissolved and liquidated when the audit work was performed, and for that reason the work was considered to be carried out for formal purposes with the company and the assessments were issued in the company's own name.

1. In relation to the shareholders, TEAC affirmed, first, that precisely for the foregoing reasons, they did not have standing to bring claims.
2. However, the court considered that the fact that the assessments were notified to them including a “challenge footnote” entails an act by the tax authorities themselves which cannot be ignored or contradicted by the reviewing authority, because this notification has created a lawful expectation for the claimant. This transpires, among others, from Supreme Court Judgment of November 12, 2007.

Review procedure

**A document prepared at the instance of a party does not have material value for the purposes of a special appeal for judicial review of final decisions**

*Central Economic-Administrative Tribunal. Decision of December 10, 2018*

An individual applied for the division of a property. Malaga Cadaster Office rejected the application due to finding inconsistencies in a produced deed. The decision rendered by the authorities became final. Later, the individual filed a special appeal for judicial review of final decisions attaching a deed for correction of the one that was originally produced.

TEAC disallowed the appeal by arguing that a special appeal for judicial review of final decisions cannot be founded on the appearance of documents with material value when these have been prepared at the instance of the appellant before lodging the appeal (which was the case of the corrected deed). Those documents appeared in a contrived or sought way, not spontaneously as required by the Supreme Court's case law. In this respect, TEAC recalled that this special route for judicial review of final decisions is not provided to compensate for the insufficient evidence that the appellant provided to the managing authority.

[VIEW TAX NEWSLETTER - DECEMBER 2018]( https://www.garrigues.com/en_GB/new/tax-newsletter-december-2018 "boton-newsletter")





















[Tax](/pt/en_GB/tags/tax)





---

 This publication is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or advice of any other kind. It does not seek to offer a comprehensive summary of the legislation and developments to which it refers nor to cover all published material, but rather to provide an overview of selected topics. It is therefore recommended that the official texts be consulted and specific professional advice be sought. Garrigues does not accept any liability for the use made of this information and assumes no obligation to update it after publication.



---





 

 



 

 

### Contact

 

 ![Eduardo Abad Valdenebro - Garrigues](/sites/default/files/styles/medium/public/team/photo/Eduardo_Abad_Valdenebro_en_20260611.jpg?itok=XJmuqiG8)

[Eduardo Abad](/pt/en_GB/team/eduardo-abad-valdenebro)




![](/themes/custom/garriguestheme/img/iconos/email-contacto.svg)[Contact](<mailto:eduardo.abad@garrigues.com >)

- +34 91 514 52 00
    
    [Madrid](https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/office/madrid)
 










 

[Find more professionals](../team)

 

 



 

### Related services 

 

- [Tax ](/pt/en_GB/services/tax)
 


 

 



 

 

- 
 


 

 



 

## Find a publication

   

   Select service   Administrative and Constitutional Law   Agribusiness and Food   Automotive   Banking and Finance   Corporate and M&amp;A   Criminal Law and Internal Investigations   Data Economy, Privacy and Cybersecurity   Dispute Resolution: Litigation and Arbitration   Energy   EU and Antitrust Law   Family Business   Fashion Law   Financial Regulation   Human Capital Services   Infrastructure   Insurance   Intellectual Property   Labor and Employment   Life Sciences and Healthcare   Media and Entertainment   Planning, Zoning and Environment   Private Equity   Real Estate   Restructuring and Insolvency   Securities Markets   Sports   Startups &amp; Open innovation   Sustainability   Tax   Technology, Communications and Digital   Tourism and Hotels   Transport, Logistics and Shipping    Facet Services detail   Facet Services detail  

 



   Select type of content   Publications   Newsletters   Garrigues collection   Laws: amendments at a glance   News    Facet Publication type detail   Facet Publication type detail  

 



  Min  

 Max  

 







 

## News search engine