## [According to the CJEU, the higher tax for dividends received by foreign pension funds is in breach of the Treaty](/pt/en_GB/new/according-cjeu-higher-tax-dividends-received-foreign-pension-funds-breach-treaty)
# According to the CJEU, the higher tax for dividends received by foreign pension funds is in breach of the Treaty
European Union - 11 / 19 / 2019
Spain Tax Alert
-
- [](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/new/according-cjeu-higher-tax-dividends-received-foreign-pension-funds-breach-treaty)
- []()
- []()
Previous Next
**The Court of Justice of the European Union has held that the higher taxation on dividends received by pension funds resident in third countries in comparison with the exemption applicable to resident funds is an unjustified infringement of free movement of capital.**
In a recent judgment handed down on November 13, 2019, the EU court of justice (CJEU) has concluded that the higher (withholding) tax in Germany for a Canadian pension fund in comparison with the taxation (virtual exemption) of German funds is precluded by EU law, at least when the nonresident fund also reserves the dividends to constitute provisions for the payment of future pensions. For German pension funds the reserved amounts were used to reduce their taxable income. Besides, they also received a refund of the withholding tax they had previously incurred. All of this combined meant a virtual exemption from German taxes. Nonresident pension funds, by contrast (including those from third countries), incurred a final withholding tax equal to 15% on an amount that did not qualify for any deductions for the provisions eventually booked.
In its judgment, the CJEU recalled that, after determining that the objectives and functioning of the German and foreign funds are essentially similar (in this case, by reserving the dividends for the payment of future pensions), the fact that Germany exercises its taxing powers over both resident and nonresident funds places them in a comparable situation. In view of this, the different tax treatment is discriminatory and restricts the free movement of capital.
On the potential justification for that restriction, the CJEU concluded that the need to ensure a balanced allocation of taxing powers between Member States and third countries cannot be taken as a valid justification in this case. Nor can it be considered that the case involves a restriction that existed on December 31, 1993 for the purpose of applying article 64.1 of the Treaty (allowing the application of restrictions existing on that date vis-à-vis third countries), because the specific legislation on the taxation of pension funds was introduced in Germany in 2002.
[Tax](/pt/en_GB/tags/tax), [Spain](/pt/en_GB/tags/spain)
---
This publication is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or advice of any other kind. It does not seek to offer a comprehensive summary of the legislation and developments to which it refers nor to cover all published material, but rather to provide an overview of selected topics. It is therefore recommended that the official texts be consulted and specific professional advice be sought. Garrigues does not accept any liability for the use made of this information and assumes no obligation to update it after publication.
---
### Contacts
[Eduardo Abad](/pt/en_GB/team/eduardo-abad-valdenebro)
[Contact]()
- +34 91 514 52 00
[Madrid](https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/office/madrid)
[Rafael Calvo](/pt/en_GB/team/rafael-calvo-salinero)
[Contact]()
- +44 (0) 20 7796 1940
[London](https://www.garrigues.com/pt/en_GB/office/london)
[Find more professionals](../team)
### Related services
- [Tax ](/pt/en_GB/services/tax)
-
## Find a publication
Select service Administrative and Constitutional Law Agribusiness and Food Automotive Banking and Finance Corporate and M&A Criminal Law and Internal Investigations Data Economy, Privacy and Cybersecurity Dispute Resolution: Litigation and Arbitration Energy EU and Antitrust Law Family Business Fashion Law Financial Regulation Human Capital Services Infrastructure Insurance Intellectual Property Labor and Employment Life Sciences and Healthcare Media and Entertainment Planning, Zoning and Environment Private Equity Real Estate Restructuring and Insolvency Securities Markets Sports Startups & Open innovation Sustainability Tax Technology, Communications and Digital Tourism and Hotels Transport, Logistics and Shipping Facet Services detail Facet Services detail
Select type of content Publications Newsletters Garrigues collection Laws: amendments at a glance News Facet Publication type detail Facet Publication type detail
Min
Max
## News search engine